Apollinarian

Related to Apollinarian: Docetism

A`pol`li`na´ri`an


a.1.(Rom. Antiq.) In honor of Apollo; as, the Apollinarian games.
n.1.(Eccl. Hist.) A follower of Apollinaris, Bishop of Laodicea in the fourth century, who denied the proper humanity of Christ.
Mentioned in ?
References in periodicals archive ?
The former represents the formless and intangible essence of life, and the latter represents the longing for clarity, order, and reason, which produces the tension of all great art, even though Nietzsche (and Hitler) end up reducing the strain in their own respective ways by negating the Apollinarian element and deifying the will to power.
Even the examples involving theological issues need not always involve Arianizing or Apollinarian views.
In contrast to the Apollinarian and Docetist heresies, Christ assumed all of humanity.
When we turn to the use of enhypostatos in the christological controversies, it will become obvious that the term did not acquire any prominence prior to the sixth century, apart from two elusive references in the Apollinarian treatise Quod unus sit Christus(28) and in the Ps.
Club Uranus is Apollinarian, and Screw - well, it's rumored to be the last holdout of the Borborites.
Three (101-102, 202) importantly analyse the Apollinarian heresy; no.
Indeed, despite adducing a considerable number of striking parallels between the work and Apollinarian material in his third chapter, he contents himself in his Foreword with the cautious statement that the question of authorship is worth reopening
This view has been encouraged by ancient critics of Cyril who also attempted to accuse him of Apollinarian views.
Those who honor Cyril through his Apollinarian formulas and those who honor Nestorius through Theodore of Mopsuestia live as churches today.
Fragments of a text written against Diodore survive in the Apollinarian corpus.
36 that, in Confessions 7,19,25, it was Alypius who held an Apollinarian view of Christ misrepresents the text - Alypius ascribed this view to the Catholics.
They seem to be replacements for the genuine correspondence by an Apollinarian eager to vindicate his teacher and who appropriated Basil's ideas (mostly from a period later than when the actual correspondence took place), but who was far from coming even anywhere near to his unique and highly sophisticated style.