inductive reasoning

(redirected from Inductive arguments)
Also found in: Thesaurus, Medical, Financial.
Related to Inductive arguments: inductive reasoning
ThesaurusAntonymsRelated WordsSynonymsLegend:
Noun1.inductive reasoning - reasoning from detailed facts to general principles
colligation - the connection of isolated facts by a general hypothesis
References in periodicals archive ?
22) Informal logic here would note that such inductive arguments are weak and/or not cogent; probability and statistics would note the low probability for the conclusion, given the small sample observed.
It reorders different kinds of inductive arguments for better flow between topics, reorganizes some sections, and omits the more difficult and confusing topics.
In other words, premises of inductive arguments are experienced but their conclusion is not experienced.
Ruth Weintraub, in 'Skepticism about Induction', rehearses Hume's argument that inductive arguments are ultimately unjustified, since they presuppose that nature is uniform although the idea that nature is uniform can itself only be established by an inductive argument.
E McKenzie's "Printers of the Mind" (1969) and his challenge to the inductive arguments of the New Bibliographers, supported by documents reporting the work of actual compositors in real printing houses.
Another section that should prove valuable to those who are interested in the logic and force of inductive arguments based upon experience concerns what Tuominen dubs the "sorties" argument (pp.
They consider competing views, make bottom-up inductive arguments from an array of facts and doubt the power of Big Ideas.
Boyd argues that one can abstract criteria for evaluating inductive arguments from Strawson's writings, and he proceeds to identify such criteria.
38--in the Treatise he stresses the regress involved in using inductive arguments to justify inductive arguments; see A Treatise of Human Nature, edited L.
Inductive arguments, which are based on the abstract principles of value rationale, enable conclusions along the lines that the rent for property X would be relatively low per square foot, because X is a larger property than the comparables, according to the principle of balance.
For, in the first place, the authors, taking their cue from Popper, represent this problem as arising from the inability of true premises in inductive arguments to guarantee the certainty of conclusions drawn.
It is fairly widely acknowledged that inductive arguments for the reliability of induction are in some sense unacceptably circular, even if the arguments do not involve the premise that induction is a truth-conducive inference form.