attorney-client privilege

(redirected from Legal professional privilege)
Also found in: Thesaurus, Legal, Acronyms, Wikipedia.
ThesaurusAntonymsRelated WordsSynonymsLegend:
Noun1.attorney-client privilege - the right of a lawyer to refuse to divulge confidential information from his clientattorney-client privilege - the right of a lawyer to refuse to divulge confidential information from his client
privilege - (law) the right to refuse to divulge information obtained in a confidential relationship
Mentioned in ?
References in periodicals archive ?
ENRC unsuccessfully argued that the materials were covered by legal professional privilege, which keeps confidential any communication between a client and lawyer if that advice has been given in anticipation of legal proceedings.
Newcastle United owner Mike Ashley He directed that any material kept by HMRC which has legal professional privilege must be returned to the club.
Police refused to waive legal professional privilege, which keeps lawyers' talks with clients confidential.
They were: information supplied by, or relating to, bodies dealing with security matters; defence; international relations; information relating to the provision of advice by any of the law officers or any request for the provision of such advice; protection of personal data; and legal professional privilege.
There are serious reservations that the Bill will include measures that could weaken legal professional privilege.
SECURITY and intelligence agencies have accessed lawyer-to-client materials covered by legal professional privilege, previously top-secret documents revealed.
But the report said this was not a case of the society being obstructive but because "legal advice provided to the Law Society and to the panel confirmed the legal professional privilege which was said to attach to some of the material was not theirs to waive, and despite considerable efforts the panel was unable to assist them to find a way round the obstacle.
commercial obligations in the form of legal professional privilege and the use of private clouds to store client communications.
On September 14, 2010, the EUCJ decided the Akzo Nobel case, (17) affirming the European Union's General Court, which held that the legal professional privilege ("LPP") did not include communications between companies and their in-house counsel.
Since 1989, Australian administrative practice has permitted a range of documents to remain confidential even where they do not enjoy the protection of legal professional privilege.
In a judgement eagerly awaited by lawyers, particularly corporate lawyers, the EU Court of Justice ruled, on 14 September, that internal company communications with in-house lawyers are not covered by legal professional privilege in the context of investigations in the field of competition law.
Legal professional privilege was still "alive and kicking," she said.