Perfective and Imperfective Aspect


Aspect is a grammatical term that has to do with how an action, state of being, or event unfolds in relation to time. The greatest distinction is made between the perfective aspect, which focuses on actions and events as whole elements, and the imperfective aspect, which deconstructs how an event is structured and located in time.
While other languages may mark the difference with an inflected verb form, English instead relies on a combination of particles, verbs, verb phrases, and lexical clues to determine whether the overall meaning of the action is perfective or imperfective.

Perfective aspect

The perfective aspect highlights actions, states, or events as a whole, presenting the actions from an outside perspective as complete, bounded events.
The perfective aspect is encountered in all of the tenses—past, present, and future—but it is easiest to illustrate in the past. For example:
In all of the above examples, the action is presented as a complete event in the past. We are simply told that the event occurred, with no clues as to how often the actions happened or how long they took.
As mentioned, the perfective aspect also occurs in other tenses. For example:

Imperfective aspect

The imperfective aspect, on the other hand, is used when we focus on the internal structures of an action, state, or event as it relates to time, such as being continuous or habitual (repeating). Again, this has nothing to do with when the event occurs, and, as with the perfective, there is no separate verb form in English for the imperfective aspect.
Instead, it is expressed through different grammatical structures, which change depending on what we are saying about the temporal structure of the action.
We sometimes classify these structures as the continuous aspect and the habitual aspect, both of which are subclasses of the imperfective.

Continuous Aspect

The continuous aspect, also called the progressive aspect, is a subclass of the imperfective that emphasizes the progressive nature of the verb, looking at it as an incomplete action in progress over a specific period of time.
The continuous aspect does not indicate the duration of the action, nor how often it occurs. It simply shows that the action or event is in progress, either at the time of speaking, or at the time that another event occurs. It can be used with the past, present, and future tenses, and it is usually conveyed using a form of the verb be + the present participle. For example:
  • “I was talking to my mother when you called.”
  • “They had been living here for a long time when they moved.”
  • “I’m cooking dinner at the moment, so I’ll have to call you back.”
  • “She’s been playing outside with her friends all day.”
  • “He’ll be sleeping by 10 o’clock, hopefully.”
  • “Next month we’ll have been living in New York City for 10 years.”
It should be noted that stative verbs do not normally occur using the be + present participle structure. For example, you could not say “I am knowing John a long time” or “She is appearing unwell.”

Other constructions

There is disagreement over whether structures using be + the present participle are the only structures that depict the continuous aspect. It is often argued, for example, that the past simple often conveys the continuous aspect. For example:
  • “I stayed up all night.”
  • “We were outside for hours.”
Others would argue that since it is the additional information in the examples above (all night and for hours) that gives the continuous aspect to the sentence as a whole, the verb phrases themselves should not be considered to convey continuous aspect.

Habitual Aspect

The habitual aspect, like the continuous aspect, is also a subclass of the imperfective aspect. It is used when an action occurs repetitively and (usually) predictably. English only has two marked ways of expressing habitual aspect: would + base form of the verb (the infinitive without to) and used to + base form of the verb. When we use these structures, we imply that the action occurred habitually in the past, but does not anymore. For example:
  • “When I was young I used to walk to school.”
  • “When I was young I would walk to school.”
Although the meaning in the two examples above is the same, used to and would are not always directly interchangeable. For example, used to, standing alone, conveys habitual aspect, but would doesn’t. Observe what happens if we remove the time marker when I was young:
  • “I used to walk to school.”
  • “I would walk to school.”
When we remove when I was young from the examples, the example using used to retains its habitual aspect, but the example with would doesn’t. Since would can also be used in conditional constructions, we need to include a time marker to clarify when it is being used for the habitual past.
In addition, while used to can be used with both action verbs and stative verbs, would can only be used with action verbs. For example:

Other constructions

Although used to + base form and would + base form are the only structures that explicitly mark habitual aspect, we often use other verb tenses to convey it as well. For example, we often use the present simple tense to indicate habitual actions, as in:
  • “I go to school every day.”
  • “She attends karate class on Sundays.”
  • “They work six days a week.”
However, other verb tenses can be used with an implied habitual aspect. For example:
  • “I walked to school every day for 10 years.” (past simple tense)
  • “I had lived in the same town my whole life before I decided to move to Tokyo.” (past perfect tense)
  • “She has eaten the same sandwich for lunch for as long as I’ve known her.” (present perfect tense)
When the habitual aspect is unmarked, as above, it is often accompanied by a time marker that clarifies how often the action occurs, such as every day, on Sundays, six days a week, etc.

Future habits

English does not have an explicit habitual aspect marker for the future either. Most often, we use the future simple tense along with a time marker to indicate habit. For example:
  • “I will work extra shifts every evening until I save enough money.”
  • “I will go for a run every day after school this year.
  • “We will eat fruit and cereal every morning next month.”
As with the alternate constructions of the perfective aspect, there is disagreement over whether unmarked verb forms can be considered to express habitual aspect, since it may simply be the additional information in the sentence that expresses the habitual meaning, rather than the verb phrases themselves.

1. Which of the following sentences conveys the perfective aspect?

2. Which of the following sentences conveys the imperfective aspect?

3. Which of the following sentences conveys the habitual aspect?

4. Which of the following sentences uses the continuous aspect?

5. Which of the following sentences is incorrect?

Complete English Grammar Rules is available for purchase as Paperback and Kindle eBook.
Share Tweet Share