Short scale Long scale billion [10.sup.9] milliard trillion [10.sup.12] billion quadrillion [10.sup.15] billiard quintillion [10.sup.18] trillion sextillion [10.sup.21] trilliard septillion [10.sup.24] quadrillion octillion [10.sup.27] quadrilliard nonillion [10.sup.30] quintillion decillion [10.sup.33] quintilliard undecillion [10.sup.36] sextillion
duodecillion [10.sup.39] sextilliard tredecillion [10.sup.42] septillion
This means that the real-life total was 13.5 deviations away from the expected mean, which implies that the odds of getting these numbers simply by chance are about one in 150
duodecillion (150 followed by 39 zeros).
The new protocol can handle one third of a
duodecillion addresses; that's 340, 282, 366, 920, 938, 463, 463, 374, 607, 451, 768, 211, 456 for those who like really big numbers.
It turned out to be 1
duodecillion - that is, 1 followed by 39 zeros.
DUODECILLION ([10.sup.39]) = [[[square root of (D/U x One)].sup.([{D + Eighty}/[square root of C]] + I + [L/L] - 1 - One - Nineteen)]
The most economical set I have been able to obtain is <ONE, THREE, FOUR, FIVE, EIGHT, N1NE, TEN, ELEVEN, FOURTEEN, EIGHTEEN, THIRTY, FORTY, ONE DECILLION, ONE
DUODECILLION, ONE TREDECILLION> which generates <C,D,E, F,G,H,I,K,L,N,O,R,T,V,Y> as follows:
The shortest number name having two more vowels than consonants is ONE
DUODECILLION ONE, and the highest is NINETY-ONE
DUODECILLION NINETY-ONE UNDECILLION NINETY-ONE DECILLION NINETY-ONE NONILLION NINETY-ONE OCTILLION NINETY-ONE QUINTILLION NINETY-ONE QUADRILLION NINETY-ONE BILLION NINETY-ONE MILLION NINETY-ONE.