References in periodicals archive ?
A porous means of thought is essentially without deliberation: it is undiscernibly permeable and as such is open to equivocation and to dehiscence.
Rather than lurking undiscernibly beneath the Du Boisian veil of social objectification, the identity or identities imposed on the peasant are themselves so thoroughly objectifiable in language that the peasant not only can comprehend them but "actively" can choose his "orientation" among them.