Deliberator


Also found in: Thesaurus, Legal.
Related to Deliberator: defibrillator

De`lib´er`a`tor


n.1.One who deliberates.
Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, published 1913 by G. & C. Merriam Co.
References in periodicals archive ?
In order to understand Aristotle's account of good deliberation, we must see that the crucial question is not whether the good deliberator knows what he should do, but rather in what sense he knows it.
On this account, an individual becomes a better deliberator by acquiring those resources which can improve his or her argumentative performance; hence the call for institutions that correct for disparities, and that guarantee each citizen the capacity to participate in deliberation (Knight and Johnson, 1997; Bohman, 1997).
In Qatar, Mindray will offer anesthesia, deliberator, infusion pump, syringe pump, monitor, ventilator and ECG under the umbrella of life support products.
In Qatar, Mindray will offer anaesthesia, deliberator, infusion pump, syringe pump, monitor, ventilator and ECG under the umbrella of life support products.
1555, 1586 (1989) ("Nothing is easier for any human being than to imagine himself a moral deliberator when he is really only asserting a self-serving ideology.
The most important of these contrasts the agenda-driven Madison pursuing his strategic goals in the first half of the Convention with the deliberator and draftsman who then became much more engaged by the technical challenges of drafting the Constitution.
Indeed, a variety of democratic "characters" may be compatible with and even required by a genuinely democratic conception of engaged citizenship (Kahne, Westheimer, & Rogers, 2000)--for example, the activist, the volunteer, the negotiator, and the rational deliberator. The distinction between charity-based and transformative service-learning provides little guidance to theory and practice, given that democratic and justice aims will likely crosscut complex social practices.
They argue that indeterminism could play a useful role, for example, in the generation of a greater number of considerations of alternate possibilities that might become cognitively available to a deliberator than might be available under a deterministic version of that process, but so long as the deliberator selects from among them on the basis of his or her considered values and reasons, the mere presence of the element of chance somewhere in the deliberative process does not entail that the decision is purely random.
(62) Tanguay-Renaud rejects that interpretation, (63) but he is plainly uncomfortable with the suggestion that a person in extremis can only be justified in acting as she did if she engaged in the sort of weighing of competing reasons that one would expect of a cool-headed deliberator. In particular, he worries about situations in which an actor rightly proceeds on the basis of incomplete or faulty information but, in so doing, weighs competing reasons incorrectly.
Each deliberator, not knowing his or her own place in a given social order, would have good reason to prefer that decisions regarding unowned property be made in light of such rules.
Therefore, a rational deliberator would oppose the imposition of legal and other restrictions on a liberty if such a restriction would influence the full and informed exercise of capacities for the conception of the good and/or the sense of justice.