nullification

(redirected from Doctrine of Nullification)
Also found in: Thesaurus, Legal, Encyclopedia.

nul·li·fi·ca·tion

 (nŭl′ə-fĭ-kā′shən)
n.
1. The act of nullifying or the state of being nullified: a referee's nullification of a goal for being scored in violation of a rule.
2.
a. The action by a state not to enforce a federal law as improperly encroaching on the scope of state power.
b. A theory justifying such action.

nul′li·fi·ca′tion·ist n.

nul•li•fi•ca•tion

(ˌnʌl ə fɪˈkeɪ ʃən)

n.
1. an act or instance of nullifying.
2. the state of being nullified.
3. the failure or refusal of a U.S. state to aid in the enforcement of federal laws within its territory.
[1620–30]
ThesaurusAntonymsRelated WordsSynonymsLegend:
Noun1.nullification - the states'-rights doctrine that a state can refuse to recognize or to enforce a federal law passed by the United States Congress
states' rights - a doctrine that federal powers should be curtailed and returned to the individual states
2.nullification - the act of nullifying; making null and void; counteracting or overriding the effect or force of something
change of state - the act of changing something into something different in essential characteristics
cancellation - the act of cancelling; calling off some arrangement
vitiation - nullification by the destruction of the legal force; rendering null; "the vitiation of the contract"
counteraction, neutralisation, neutralization - action intended to nullify the effects of some previous action
neutralization, neutralisation - action intended to keep a country politically neutral or exclude it from a possible war; "the neutralization of Belgium"

nullification

noun
Translations

nullification

[ˌnʌlɪfɪˈkeɪʃən] Nanulación f, invalidación f

nullification

n
Annullierung f, → Aufhebung f
References in periodicals archive ?
88) Today, even in spite of Cooper, some continue to cling to the doctrine of nullification via the Ninth and Tenth Amendments (89) or by way of states' "sovereign power" to determine when the federal government has overstepped its constitutional bounds.
Perhaps even more important, he is the ablest defender of the idea of government by consensus of all its members and the doctrine of nullification on which that form of government rests.
Upon closer examination, it becomes possible to view these measures as falling short of invoking the clearly repudiated doctrine of nullification and as capable of contributing under certain conditions to safeguarding federalism principles.