Level of Significance for the variations of means was tested using four factorial ANOVA
. Duncan's multiple range test (DMRT) at (p was used to compare the variance between means of the treatments (Steel et al., 1997).
A Factorial ANOVA
was used in the analysis to verify if the accuracy in the judgment of the images varied according to the previous experience of the judges and the sound class.
To analyze differences associated with the main and interaction effects of group characteristics, a factorial ANOVA
was performed using CENVE scores as dependent variables and age, gender, and educational level as fixed factors.
To evaluate the difference in the amount of surround inhibition after rPAS between focal dystonia and controls, we performed a factorial ANOVA
. Moreover, to evaluate differences in SEP amplitude between dystonic patients and controls, we used the unpaired Mann Whitney U test.
Comparisons were performed, first, through one-way ANOVA including controls and treatments, then, by using a two-way factorial ANOVA
with interactions including only the treatments with subsequent post hoc tests (Duncan).
This study used a factorial analysis of variance (factorial ANOVA
) that consisted of two independent variables and one or more dependent variable (Mertler & Vannatta, 2010).
Analysis of results (Figure 1) by factorial ANOVA
revealed that the elastic sleeve tested in this study reduced the anterior displacement of the tibia by a small (max.
A 3 (Participant group: college students, university students and business persons) x 2 (Expectancy: positive or negative) Factorial ANOVA
of mixed design was conducted (sphericity not assumed, Greenhouse-Geisser correction implemented).
Additionally, a series of 2 x 2 factorial ANOVA
were performed to test main and interaction effects of gender and level of study on various dimensions of the information seeking anxiety construct (hypotheses three).
Apoptosis was monitored by (a) western blot analysis for cleaved caspase-3 ([beta]-actin was used as loading control), (b) TUNEL staining (n = 3 independent experiments with 2 counting regions of 200 cells/region in duplicate; ### P < 0.001 and # P < 0.05 versus 0 [micro]g/mL; *** P < 0.001 versus [Casp3.sup.+/+]; factorial ANOVA
with genotype and treatment as category factors; Dunnett post hoc) and (c) caspase-3/7 fluorometric activity assay (n = 3 independent experiments; ## P < 0.01, # P < 0.05, and NS, not significant, versus 0 [micro]g/mL; *** p < 0.001 versus [Casp3.sup.-/-]; factorial ANOVA
with genotype and treatment as category factors; Dunnett post hoc).
Immediate data collection was not possible due to the time taken to row back to the boating dock area Data Analysis Hypotheses 1 and 2 were addressed across the three training conditions using a 3 (condition; low moderate high) x 2 (gender) mixed factorial ANOVA
. Differences in attentional strategy across the two competition distances were analyzed using a 2 (race diatance) x 2 (gender) mixed factorial ANOVA
The data on the tube numbers and length were analyzed with a 3-way factorial ANOVA
using days, quadrat, and species as variables [25, 26].