Lamarckian

(redirected from Lamarckians)
Also found in: Thesaurus, Medical.

La·marck·i·an

 (lə-mär′kē-ən)
adj.
Of or relating to Lamarckism.
n.
A supporter of Lamarckism.
American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition. Copyright © 2016 by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. All rights reserved.

Lamarckian

(lɑːˈmɑːkɪən)
adj
(Biology) of or relating to Lamarck
n
(Biology) a supporter of Lamarckism
Collins English Dictionary – Complete and Unabridged, 12th Edition 2014 © HarperCollins Publishers 1991, 1994, 1998, 2000, 2003, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2011, 2014

La•marck•i•an

(ləˈmɑr ki ən)

adj.
1. of or pertaining to Jean de Lamarck or Lamarckism.
n.
2. an advocate of Lamarckism.
[1840–50]
Random House Kernerman Webster's College Dictionary, © 2010 K Dictionaries Ltd. Copyright 2005, 1997, 1991 by Random House, Inc. All rights reserved.
ThesaurusAntonymsRelated WordsSynonymsLegend:
Noun1.Lamarckian - a believer in Lamarckism
follower - a person who accepts the leadership of another
Adj.1.Lamarckian - of or relating to Lamarckism; "Lamarckian theories"
Based on WordNet 3.0, Farlex clipart collection. © 2003-2012 Princeton University, Farlex Inc.
References in periodicals archive ?
Epigenetics, in which the environment changes gene behavior without altering the genes themselves, has given a glimmer of hope to die-hard Lamarckians. Epigenetics does allow traits acquired during an organism's lifetime to be passed on to offspring.
"Isn't that Lamarckian evolution?" e-mailed Paul Hyer.
As Lamarckians, they held that improving the environment could better the population and that such improvements would be inherited.
18 / We do not have to be Lamarckians to hold to something like an idea of "somatic adaptation" or learning of the kind Gregory Bateson explored in his essay, "The Role of Somatic Change in Evolution" (in Steps to an Ecology of Mind [New York: Random House, 1975], pp.
Etienne and Isidore Geoffroy St.-Hilaire, Etienne Serres, Julien-Joseph Virey, Jean-Baptiste Bory de Saint-Vincent and the other naturalists discussed by Goulven Laurent can be thought of as Lamarckians of one kind or another, if one so wishes; but Michelet--as an historiographer--is a better candidate than any of these for the label of "pre-Darwinian."
Historians of nineteenth century natural science, particularly French ones, have often treated the failure of Lamarckian theory to unite a clear consensus of contemporary opinion as a particularly bewildering chapter in the progress of scientific knowledge.
He developed these ideas primarily to rescue plasticity from Lamarckian inheritance.
He was also aware of the emergence of critiques of Lamarckian inheritance theories developed in what was known at the time as "neo" Darwinism, commonly associated with the name of the German zoologist August Weismann (1834-1914).
This group, comprised of a wide variety of mainly Protestant interpreters of evolution, emphasized issues of evolutionary progress, Lamarckian adaptationism, and inner evolutionary drive, all of which were undermined by subsequent empirical and theoretical developments.
The Lamarckian theory of evolution helps to explain Wharton's perspective more clearly than a study of Darwin's influence alone.
Lamarckian theory provided Wharton with something crucial: a link between science and her most cherished belief, which she described as "continuity, that 'sense of the past' which enriches the present and binds us up with the world's great stabilising traditions of art and poetry and knowledge" (Wharton, French 97).
Kellogg's Darwinism To-day (1907) and Robert Heath Lock's The Recent Progress in the Study of Variation, Heredity and Evolution (1906).(24) Kellogg argued that although Darwin's theories of natural selection may explain the continuous changes of evolution, they did not sufficiently explain the formation of new species.(25) While recognizing the challenge that DeVries' mutation theories posed to natural selection arguments, Kellogg eventually embraced an essentially Lamarckian perspective in which the transmission of acquired characteristics was primarily responsible for new species formation: