a.1.Not in accordance with nature; unnatural.
References in periodicals archive ?
To suppose They share that world, to think their sort is Matched by something in it, shows [TEXT NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] How separate and unearthly love is, Or women are, or what they do, Or in our young unreal wishes Seem to be: synthetic, new, And natureless in ecstasies.
When sweet and bitter mingled together, no reed was plaited, no rushes muddied the water, the gods were nameless, natureless, futureless.
Why is it that the metaphysically thin, or natureless, or lightweight concept of truth should be a sure-fire sign of expressive and proof-theoretic strength?