Sup Ct

Sup. Ct.

1. Superior Court.
2. Supreme Court.
Random House Kernerman Webster's College Dictionary, © 2010 K Dictionaries Ltd. Copyright 2005, 1997, 1991 by Random House, Inc. All rights reserved.
References in periodicals archive ?
TD Bank, 2013 NY Slip Op 3273(U) (Sup Ct, Nassau County 2013) where the defendants in a personal injury action located a photograph on a public, unblocked portion of the plaintiffs Facebook page depicting the plaintiff holding scuba gear on a beach in front of a cruise ship.
(65) Six cases included female consumers, individually or as class representatives: Allen Sup Ct, supra note 62; Berube, supra note 62; Friesen, supra note 62; McLean, supra note 62; Liebrecht, supra note 62; Trepanier, supra note 62; and Douez SC, supra note 62.
See also Krynen v Bugg (2003), 64 OR (3d) 393 at 410,24 CCEL (3d) 74 (Sup Ct J) [Krynen] where Killeen J states: "[w]here expectations are apparently reasonable on their face but where there is a contract dealing with these expectations, the reasonableness of these expectations cannot prevail over the contract."
(3.) 1176560 Ontario Limited v Great Atlantic & Pacific Co of Canada Ltd, 62 OR (3d) 535 at para 55, 28 CPC (5th) 135 (Sup Ct J) [A&P]; Sorbara v Canada (Attorney General), [2009] GSTC 33, [2009] OJ No 657 (QL), (Sup Ct J) [cited to QL] ("by their very nature, in virtually every class action, the representative plaintiff will have little to gain as an individual and thus it becomes arguable that he or she is litigating altruistically and thus in the interest of others; namely a sector of the public" at para 14).
(15) [2009] OJ No 3074, 196 CRR (2d) 288 at paras 5257 (Ont Sup Ct) [Polius].
We are looking at some new Sup Ct justices, permanent overhaul of the health care system, and, thanks to you, we've re-elected Jimmy Carter.
(13) Kramer v Belfi, 482 NYS 2d 898, 899-900 (Sup Ct App Div 2d Dept, 1984) (`Kramer'); Viscardi v Lerner, 510 NYS 2d 183, 185 (Sup Ct App Div 2d Dept, 1986) (`Viscardi'); Spivey v Pulley, 526 NYS 2d 145, 146-7 (Sup Ct App Div 2d Dept, 1988) (`Spivey'); Mali v De Forest & Duer, 553 NYS 2d 391, 392 (Sup Ct App Div 1st Dept, 1990) (`Mali'); Deeb v Johnson, 566 NYS 2d 688 (Sup Ct App Div 3d Dept, 1991) (`Deeb'); Berry v Dodson, Nunley & Taylor, 717 SW 2d 716, 718 (Tex Ct App, 1986) (`Berry'); Barcelo v Elliott, 923 SW 2d 575, 578-9 (Tex, 1996) (`Barcelo'); Gamboa v Shaw, 956 SW 2d 662, 664 (Tex 4th Dist Ct App, 1997).
Homebuilder Inc v Man-Sonic Industries Inc (1987), 22 CPC (2d) 39, 5 ACWS (3d) 381 (Ont Sup Ct J); Zidaric v Toshiba of Canada Ltd (2000), 5 CCLT (3d) 61 at para 14, 101 ACWS (3d) 722 (Ont Sup Ct J) [Zidaric]; Amertek Inc v Canadian Commercial Corp (2003), 229 DLR (4th) 419 at paras 369-70, 124 ACWS (3d) (Ont Sup Ct J) [Amertek Sup Ct J].
In Schleier, 115 Sup Ct. 2159 (1995), the Supreme Court denied the Sec.