acidulous

(redirected from acidulously)
Also found in: Thesaurus, Medical.
Related to acidulously: acidulous water

acidulous

moderately acid or tart; sharp; caustic: an acidulous critique
Not to be confused with:
assiduous – constant; persevering; unremitting: assiduous investigation; continuous; tireless; diligent: an assiduous pursuit of perfection

a·cid·u·lous

 (ə-sĭj′ə-ləs)
adj.
Slightly sour in taste or in manner.

[From Latin acidulus, diminutive of acidus, sour; see acid.]

acidulous

(əˈsɪdjʊləs) or

acidulent

adj
1. rather sour
2. sharp or sour in speech, manner, etc; acid
[C18: from Latin acidulus sourish, diminutive of acidus sour]

a•cid•u•lous

(əˈsɪdʒ ə ləs)

also a•cid•u•lent

(-lənt)

adj.
1. slightly sour.
2. sharp; caustic: acidulous criticism.
3. moderately acid or tart; subacid.
[1760–70; < Latin acidulus. See acid, -ulous]
ThesaurusAntonymsRelated WordsSynonymsLegend:
Adj.1.acidulous - being sour to the taste
sour - having a sharp biting taste

acidulous

adjective
Having a taste characteristic of that produced by acids:
Translations

acidulous

[əˈsɪdjʊləs] ADJacídulo
References in periodicals archive ?
'While bemoaning what is happening in New Zealand, we shouldn't wait until any tragedy befalls the house, but rather work acidulously to ensure that visitors who are come here are screened for our own good.'
She writes, for instance, that Kafka "always counts himself among the Jews be so heartily despises," and from there she proceeds to the assertion that Kafka sees his own literary efforts as a "sham." But what about Kafka's famous remarks on the "terrifyingly physical" nature of "his writing hand" and its rare "truth?" Similarly, Volkov presents Theodor Lessing as having been contemptuous only of Eastern Jews, when his most notorious, most acidulously anti-Jewish polemics targeted his fellow acculturated literati.
As Mark Twain acidulously remarked, "A classic is something that everybody wants to have read and nobody wants to read." Bruce Schneier's Applied Cryptography, published in 1996, is a classic in the canon of computer security works; it's a seminal, important book for the experts in the field or for those with the technical background, but it is far too complex and mathematical for most readers.