conative


Also found in: Medical, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia.

co·na·tion

 (kō-nā′shən)
n. Psychology
The aspect of mental processes or behavior directed toward action or change and including impulse, desire, volition, and striving.

[Latin cōnātiō, cōnātiōn-, effort, from cōnātus, past participle of cōnārī, to try.]

co·na′tion·al, co′na·tive (kō′nə-tĭv, kŏn′ə-) adj.

conative

(ˈkɒnətɪv; ˈkəʊ-)
adj
1. (Grammar) grammar denoting an aspect of verbs in some languages used to indicate the effort of the agent in performing the activity described by the verb
2. (Psychology) of or relating to conation
Translations
konativní
conatiefproberendtrachtend
References in periodicals archive ?
3 Conative Doyle/Kzhmzharv 20-1 Dropper flies late 2 Firewater Jake Valdivia/Cox 9-5 Tough most every time 6 Dollar Blue Murrill/Correas 6-1 In tough but pace suits 4 V Tach M.
Such a view claims that one's normatively favored conative reactions are the key to this extra value.
Are multiple points of attachment necessary to predict cognitive, affective, conative, or behavioral loyalty?
Schiffman and Kanuk (2004) proposed that attitudes are made up of three components: (a) cognitive (beliefs), (b) affective (feelings and emotions), and (c) conative (behavior).
In my attempt to better understand the development of these behaviours, and their role in the development of eportfolios, I compiled information on aspects of the domains outlined by Huitt and Cain (2005; aff ective, cognitive, and conative) to find a possible alignment with some of the critical competencies presented by Gardiner (1994).
An image will be influenced by cognitive, affective, and conative components, and this has been accepted by the previous researcher (Kaplanidou & Gibson, 2012).
It has cognitive, conative, and affective components of its own.
This view has four principal virtues: (1) it is consistent with traditional semantic theories; (2) it supports a form of motivational judgment intemalism that does justice to externalist intuitions; (3) it illuminates the connection between normative language and normative thought; and (4) it explains how speakers can express different conative states when speaking in different normative domains.
Furthermore, attitude is divided into three components: cognitive (i.e., beliefs), affective (i.e., emotions and feelings), and conative (i.e., intention to behave) (Schiffman & Wisenblit, 2015).