enthymeme


Also found in: Wikipedia.

en·thy·meme

 (ĕn′thə-mēm′)
n. Logic
A syllogism in which one of the premises or the conclusion is not stated explicitly.

[Latin enthȳmēma, from Greek enthūmēma, a rhetorical argument, from enthūmeisthai, to consider : en-, in; see en-2 + thūmos, mind.]

enthymeme

(ˈɛnθɪˌmiːm)
n
1. (Logic) an incomplete syllogism, in which one or more premises are unexpressed as their truth is considered to be self-evident
2. (Logic) any argument some of whose premises are omitted as obvious
[C16: via Latin from Greek enthumēma, from enthumeisthai to infer (literally: to have in the mind), from en-2 + thumos mind]
ˌenthymeˈmatic, ˌenthymeˈmatical adj

en•thy•meme

(ˈɛn θəˌmim)

n.
a syllogism or other argument in which a premise or the conclusion is unexpressed.
[1580–90; < Latin enthȳmēma < Greek enthymēma thought, argument, derivative of enthȳmē-, variant s. of enthȳmeîsthai to ponder]
en`thy•me•mat′ic, adj.
Translations
Mentioned in ?
References in periodicals archive ?
Enthymeme is: those who do not support the policy of attacking Iraq actually want to wait and see how and when Iraq and other terrorist will use these weapons of terror against America and rest of the civilized world.
One of the main objectives of this form of logic from categories to poetics was to introduce Aristotle in everyday language and to show how all our elementary reasoning deals with what the Greek philosopher formalized in his rhetoric as an enthymeme.
This is an enthymeme that is (as Dove suggests in this issue) a classic instance of argument by sign.
The following is a second-order enthymeme because it leaves out the minor premise:
Among the topics are understanding narratives with argumentation, preferential reasoning based on abstract argumentation semantics, towards an integrated theory of causal scenarios and evidential arguments, resolution-based grounded semantics revisited, enthymeme construction in dialogues using shared knowledge, support for factor-based argumentation, a benchmark framework for a computational argumentation competition, and implementing instantiation of knowledge bases in argumentation frameworks.
First, Trump makes excellent use of an argument Aristotle called the enthymeme - an argument that most effective persuaders naturally adopt without purposeful design, but with a good understanding of human nature.
In this paper, I shall focus on one specific figure of speech, namely hypallage, metaphor's neighbor, which shares some features of metonymy and enthymeme.
Thomas's argument is unpacked as an enthymeme that assumes the reader's familiarity with Aristotle's discussion of the soul in the De anima, what emerges overall is an argument that is quite different from how it has traditionally been understood.
This article will first offer a conceptual overview for the enthymeme as a rhetorical response to crises, before turning to an analysis of U.
An enthymeme is an informally stated syllogism with an implied premise.
The second premise lying behind the progressive enthymeme is, however, simply illogical, not to say absurd; that is, the dichotomy necessarily erected by this argument between taxpayers (mysteriously incorporated into the "public sector") and "business" may be advanced only by the ignorant or the cynical.
While Aristotle noted that often an audience must fill in the missing premise of an enthymeme, this model promotes a more complicated processing of missing pieces.