illation

(redirected from illations)
Also found in: Thesaurus, Legal.

il·la·tion

 (ĭ-lā′shən)
n.
1. The act of inferring or drawing conclusions.
2. A conclusion drawn; a deduction. Also called illative.

[Late Latin illātiō, illātiōn-, from Latin illātus, past participle of īnferre, to carry in, infer : in-, in; see in-2 + lātus, brought; see telə- in Indo-European roots.]

illation

(ɪˈleɪʃən)
n
(Logic) a rare word for inference
[C16: from Late Latin illātiō a bringing in, from Latin illātus brought in, from inferre to bring in, from in-2 + ferre to bear, carry]

il•la•tion

(ɪˈleɪ ʃən)

n.
1. the act of inferring.
2. an inference; conclusion.
[1525–35; < Latin illātiō act of bringing in, derivative (with -tiō -tion) of inferre to bear in (past participle illātus); see infer]

illation

the process of inferring or deducing; also, that which is inferred or deduced. — illative, adj.
See also: Thinking
ThesaurusAntonymsRelated WordsSynonymsLegend:
Noun1.illation - the reasoning involved in drawing a conclusion or making a logical judgment on the basis of circumstantial evidence and prior conclusions rather than on the basis of direct observation
abstract thought, logical thinking, reasoning - thinking that is coherent and logical
analogy - an inference that if things agree in some respects they probably agree in others
corollary - (logic) an inference that follows directly from the proof of another proposition
derivation - a line of reasoning that shows how a conclusion follows logically from accepted propositions
entailment, implication, deduction - something that is inferred (deduced or entailed or implied); "his resignation had political implications"
extrapolation - an inference about the future (or about some hypothetical situation) based on known facts and observations
presumption - (law) an inference of the truth of a fact from other facts proved or admitted or judicially noticed

illation

noun
A position arrived at by reasoning from premises or general principles:
Translations
References in periodicals archive ?
universall] may perchance subscribe to the same more universall B2 | perchance subscribe to the same universal B3 (g) And partly] B1, B2 | partly [begin strikethrough]/ And partly[end strikethrough] B3 (h) Elations] [begin strikethrough]A[?]ti[?][end strikethrough] <Elations> B1 | illations B2, B3 (i) which] B1, B3 | of B2 (j) wits] [begin strikethrough]w[?]its[end strikethrough] <wits> B1 | Witts B2 | wits B3 (k) that] B1, B2 | [begin strikethrough]that[end strikethrough] B3 (l) them other] others B2 | them others B3 (m) and] B1, B2 | [begin strikethrough]&[end strikethrough] <which> B3 (n) not] <not> (o) inferences] B1, B2 inf<l>erences B3 (p) a] <a> (q) tho] B1, B2 | <which,> tho B3
The scenario where the illations are developed, part of the existence of a metallurgical company, Carol Inc., that has been participating in the industry of metals and laminates for 20 years.
admit to basic illations, or assert that analysis really is