Also found in: Encyclopedia, Wikipedia.


1. Unpredictability.
2. Philosophy The doctrine that there are events, particularly free human actions or decisions, that have no cause or are not caused deterministically.

in′de·ter′min·ist n.
in′de·ter′min·is′tic adj.


(Philosophy) the philosophical doctrine that behaviour is not entirely determined by motives
ˌindeˈterminist n, adj
ˌindeˌterminˈistic adj


(ˌɪn dɪˈtɜr məˌnɪz əm)

a theory that human actions, though influenced by preexisting conditions, are not entirely governed by them.
in`de•ter′min•ist, n., adj.


the quality of not being clearly established or fixed. — indeterminist, n.indeterministic, adj.
See also: Attitudes
Mentioned in ?
References in periodicals archive ?
"Indeterminism and the Theory of Agency." Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol.
Though Zeh highlights the apparent incompatibility of a deterministic wave function and the "fundamental indeterminism of the future" implicit in probabilistic classical outcomes (2010, 5, 92), this conflict dissolves with the realization that quantum theory deals with different aspects of time.
Since Max Born interpreted the wave function in terms of probability, the question about realism/idealism and determinism/ indeterminism has led to the emergence of different interpretations.
Similarly, calls for reform to police policies including the end to "broken windows" policing, the use of body cams, enhanced community oversight, greater independence between investigations and prosecutions, demilitarization of police forces and others are critical, but none will be sufficient, both because of ontological indeterminism and because of the tendency for any such change to be reterritorialized back into existing patterns and structures of power and resource distribution.
There is one good argument for the claim that freedom is incompatible with indeterminism (the Mind Argument).
process of creation and indeterminism of nature make us conclude that
The determinate/indeterminate distinction takes for granted that all properties are evaluable, then goes on to account for metaphysical unsettledness with indeterminism. The fine-grained/coarse-grained distinction concerns whether all properties are evaluable.
The amount of information deposited by neutrosophic variable inspires the ACO to calculate the transition rule and find parameters of membership, indeterminism and non-membership declarations.
Let's start by noticing that we have two different conceptions of indeterminism. One is epistemic, and consists in the impossibility of knowing all the truths about the future (relative to a time t) of a world w from the complete knowledge of the laws of nature that hold at w and the complete knowledge about the entire history of w up to t.
Accepting this possibility would seem to remove the need for any of the rest of Grosso's argument, which delves into quantum indeterminism in a search for a "physics of levitation" (Chapter 8).
Zembylas and Boler argue for a "pedagogy of discomfort" whereby possibilities for transformation are located in "learning to inhabit ambiguity, discomfort and indeterminism" (2002).
Uncertainty also incorporates novelty, non-repeatability, and unpredictability, and also entails indeterminism in decisions.