And yet, as we follow the course of Watts's argument, we belatedly decode that a mirroring inversion characteristic of janiform interpretation actually ensues and that different contexts--from antiquity to modernity--are actually illuminated by Conrad's text.
Sometimes, he even stretches his janiform approach to ventriloquize Conrad's own possible thoughts on questions of artistic creation, speaking mimetically, that is, in Conrad's own name.
On the other, more personal side, they testify to Watts's affective resonances with what he calls "Conrad's janiform temperament" (47-8), a protean temperament he uses to illuminate the text from the outside-in.
Typically, however, Conrad's fiction eschews this distinction, blurring the boundaries between subjectivity and objectivity in Janiform
narratives that simultaneously allow for and make problematic the transmission and understanding of experience.