noncognitivism


Also found in: Wikipedia.

noncognitivism

(ˌnɒnˈkɒɡnɪtɪˌvɪzəm)
n
(Philosophy) philosophy the semantic meta-ethical thesis that moral judgments do not express facts and so do not have a truth value, thus excluding both naturalism and non-naturalism. See emotivism, prescriptivism
References in periodicals archive ?
Among those struggling to unseat the prevailing subjectivism or noncognitivism of twentieth-century ethics, some prominent figures have turned to the history of philosophy to understand better the emergence of the metaphysical picture thought to undergird this prevalence.
Section 1 describes a natural way of formulating noncognitivism, which I label conativism.
With a view to Bentham' and Austin's Utilitarianism, and in order to sweep away the bandied ambuigity of the label "positivism" he pinpointed five main theses which are in short: 1) the contention that laws are commands of human beings; 2) the contention that there is no necessary connection between law and morals or law as it is and law as it ought to be; 3) the contention that the analysis (or study of the meaning) of legal concepts is worth pursuing and to be distinguished from historical and sociological inquiries and from the moral criticism or approval, or otherwise; 4) the contention that a legal system is a "closed legal system"; 5) the contention that moral judgments cannot be established or defended ("noncognitivism" in ethic) (7).
Instead, (Humean) skepticism and noncognitivism in ethics may well give rise to less moral absolutism and ideology and, as a result, to less violence and oppression.
This way of expressing the moral error theory permits us to distinguish it from moral noncognitivism: the moral noncognitivist too denies that the items in question exist, but also holds that moral utterances are not assertions because they do not express beliefs, and hence are not truth-apt.
But Hart may also have been committed to a form of noncognitivism
First let us look at the way that noncognitivism might be thought to explain transparency.
If constitutionalization of substantive criminal law is a solution to the problem of overcriminalization, then a necessary step--not to say a complete solution--is to jettison the jurisprudence of revealed preferences and the philosophical commitments to noncognitivism and consequentialism that lie behind it.
He labels this stance "pragmatic moral skepticism," (57) and to distinguish it from other metaethical views with which it might be confused, he spends several pages exploring its relation to some familiar philosophical doctrines, including relativism, pluralism, subjectivism, skepticism, noncognitivism, and particularism.
This interpretation of noncognitivism is mistaken for the same reasons Adler's understanding of expression is erroneous.
Value pluralism is not to be confused with emotivism, noncognitivism, or Humean arguments against the rational status of moral propositions.
Noncognitivism is thought to be defective because it fails to give moral judgments truth-conditions; some truth-conditional accounts are thought to be defective because they fail to capture the normativity of moral judgments.