9,531,473 being asserted by Dali Wireless in co-pending litigation are unpatentable
. The PTAB ruled that each of claims 6-21 were invalid in view of the prior art submitted by CommScope.
patent be cancelled as unpatentable
, but only under novelty and
Therefore, if a reference disclosing the claimed invention in the regular application is published after the filing date of the PPA but prior to the filing date of the regular application, that reference would qualify as prior art against the claimed invention and could render the invention unpatentable
. Further, when a PPA is filed, an applicant organization will often give the green light to its employees to publically disclose the invention through advertisements, technical publications or other forms of public disclosure.
In its decision, the PTO concluded that Argentum "satisfied its burden of demonstrating, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the subject matter of claims 1-20 would have been obvious," and therefore ordered "that claims 1-20 are held unpatentable
Had there been a patent office, it might have ruled, as courts do now, that mathematical advances uncover pre-existing knowledge rather than create anything new - and are hence unpatentable
. The conundrum of whether mathematics is discovered or invented is as old as Plato.
On May 12, 2017, the USPTO upheld the claims of Avid's 309 Patent, but found the claims of the 808 Patent unpatentable
Avita holds that all claims in the '430 patent are unpatentable
and should be cancelled.
Mayo challenged the validity of the patent, and the Court held that this diagnostic method was unpatentable
The line between patentable and unpatentable
subject matter is
The Supreme Court's Alice decision created a two-part test: a claim is unpatentable
if first, it is directed to an abstract idea, and second, fails to embody an inventive concept.
As such, the information is unpatentable
. Because traditional knowledge is already within the public domain, any patentable "improvements" on the traditional knowledge made by third parties would not be considered improvements at all, but rather original inventions.
Gene patents have been ruled unpatentable
by the US Supreme Court if they depend only on natural phenomena, including sequences found in nature.